The first week of the program focused on organizational structure and team integration. We were officially divided into 6-person project teams. During the introductory sessions, the faculty presented the overall curriculum and outlined the specific objectives and learning outcomes for each course.
To foster collaboration, we participated in two key sessions:
The primary goal for this week was to integrate the group and define our project direction. We followed a two-step selection process:
1) Smartification of Everyday Objects - A smart, reusable water bottle connected to a mobile app to track hydration. 2) Smartification of Buildings - Integrating embedded intelligence into technical devices to extend their operational lifespan. 3) Aircraft Surface Treatment Robot - A specialized robot designed for de-icing, cleaning, or damage inspection of aircraft.
The first week was successful in establishing a strong group dynamic and narrowing down our technical focus. Our immediate next objective is awaiting feedback from our supervisors to evaluate the feasibility of our ideas and finalize the selection of a single project theme.
The team participated in a series of interdisciplinary sessions designed to refine the product's market fit and technical execution. In the Marketing track, work focused on the Value Proposition using the Business Model Canvas and the development of a concise Elevator Pitch. Management classes introduced various project leadership styles, including Scrum, Agile, and Waterfall, providing a framework for organizing our workflow. Additionally, a Design Thinking workshop allowed the team to deeply analyze the target audience and identify potential buyers for the system.
On the technical side, a hands-on workshop was held using Ultrasonic (Sonar) sensors to practice distance detection and signal integration. To improve internal dynamics, team-building activities were conducted in the park, where each group prepared an exercise to strengthen communication and team spirit.
Significant progress was made in defining the brand identity and technical requirements for the product. The team officially named the device “Traqua,” a combination of the words “Track” and “Aqua,” and created the initial logo.
Formal documentation has also commenced, with the team drafting the Introduction section of the project report. During team meetings, we discussed the initial product concept and the specific technical challenges involved in selecting and integrating the right sensors to ensure accurate data. To optimize this research phase, the team divided into specialized subgroups, with each group focusing on examining sensors capable of measuring water quality, tracking water quantity, or implementing water filtering solutions.
The week concluded with the finalization of the core concept and the preparation of materials for the upcoming project milestone. The team was informed of the requirement to produce a Black Box Diagram, a Schematic Draft, and a pitch progress presentation for the next meeting.
Moving forward, the primary focus will be on refining the Traqua pitch and finalizing the technical drawings to illustrate the system's data and energy flow. These deliverables will be essential for the next project review, where we will present our progress and the finalized hardware architecture.
During the third week of the project, the team focused on transitioning from abstract concepts to structured business and technical documentation. A significant portion of the week was dedicated to the Design Thinking Workshop, where the group developed a promotional video to visualize the Traqua user experience and communicate the core value of active sanitization. This creative exercise allowed the team to better define the product's market positioning and user interaction flow.
In parallel with the marketing sessions, the team refined the fundamental business architecture of the project. This included the formalization of the Problem Statement, the development of the Business Model Canvas, and a detailed breakdown of the Value Proposition. By focusing on these strategic elements, the team was able to clearly articulate how Traqua addresses the “invisible” hygiene gap in the reusable bottle market through a combination of hardware sterilization and software-driven hydration coaching.
The technical focus of the week was directed toward hardware research and system architecture. The team conducted extensive research into specific electronic components, prioritizing the selection of the UV-C LED, TDS sensors, and the ESP32 microcontroller. These research findings were integrated into the first iterations of the Structural Drafts and the Black Box Diagram. While these initial diagrams provided a foundational overview of the system's logic, the team identified the need to further standardize the functional blocks to meet professional engineering requirements in the upcoming week.
During this week, the team made progress across both technical and documentation aspects of the project. We worked on the selection and presentation of materials and components, ensuring that they align with the project requirements. At the same time, we continued developing and refining the system design, including updating the black box diagram and correcting previous errors.
A significant part of the work focused on addressing technical challenges related to the safe use of UV-C light. We explored different solutions, including bottle geometry modifications, the use of magnetic sensing systems, and alternative material choices to reduce reflectivity. Additionally, we considered the implementation of geometric barriers as a simple and effective safety feature. These concepts were discussed and further evaluated to determine their feasibility.
We also made progress on the written report. We started working on sections related to Marketing, Ethics, Sustainability, and Project Development. We also focused on our product’s branding, developing a proposed color palette, logo, and fonts. Additionally, we created the first version of the TRAQUA flyer.
Furthermore, we continued improving the overall quality of the report by updating the material table and ensuring proper formatting of references using the required BibTeX standard. Overall, this week’s work contributed to both the technical development of the project and the advancement of the accompanying documentation.
The team continued to advance both the design and documentation of the project. We created a cardboard model of the product, which allowed for better visualization of the overall concept. In addition, the detailed schematics were reviewed and further refined based on feedback.
Work on promotional materials also progressed, as we developed and presented the second version of the flyer. After discussion and evaluation, we finalized the preferred version. We also continued working on the report chapters related to Marketing, Ethics, Sustainability, and Project Development, improving their content and structure.
During this week, we focused on clarifying the requirements for the project management chapter and began working on this part of the report. We also received feedback on the sustainability chapter, which allowed us to make further improvements. Overall, this week focused on refining designs, finalizing key concepts, and improving both documentation and project planning.
The sixth week of the project was primarily dedicated to the finalization of the Interim Report and the strategic planning of the upcoming Interim Presentation. This involved a comprehensive review of the structural drafts, the Business Model Canvas, and the competitive analysis to ensure all sections met the required academic and professional standards.
In addition to finalizing the written documentation, the team focused on the development of the Interim Presentation. This process included defining the core narrative of the presentation to effectively communicate the Traqua value proposition to the evaluation panel. The team conducted a strategic planning session to divide the presentation responsibilities.
During the seventh week of the project, the team concentrated heavily on the development of our packaging solution and the refinement of our visual assets. A significant portion of our efforts went into optimizing the 3D model video. To improve the user suggestion concept, we decided to incorporate a hand holding the bottle to clarify the intended interaction. Technical adjustments were also prioritized for the video, including the use of darker text and stronger background contrast to ensure readability, alongside the addition of surface textures and the Traqua logo to provide greater visual depth and brand identity.
Parallel to the visual design, we met with our teacher to discuss and refine our detailed schematic diagrams. This review ensured that the technical foundation of the project is sound as we move toward the physical assembly phase.
Regarding our promotional materials, both the leaflet and poster underwent a thorough review. We are currently correcting minor spelling errors and condensing the leaflet text for better impact.
During the 8th week, the team finalized the packaging solution. Our work was focused on finishing the scientific paper and correcting minor spelling errors in our report file. We also received the ordered elements for our prototype, so we have been discussing and deciding how the work should be organized next week to focus on prototype building. During Thursday's weekly meeting, the video of our product was shown. We still have to record the voiceover for the video and standardize the graphics of our final product that we are using in our advertising materials.
The first team meeting was primarily focused on establishing our work framework and generating project concepts. Following the agenda, we covered the following:
The primary objective of the second meeting was to narrow down the wide range of ideas from the previous day into a concrete list of project proposals.
The team conducted a formal voting process to evaluate the ideas generated during the brainstorming session. Based on the group’s expertise and interest, we finalized our Top 3 Project Topics:
Action Items: Bernardo was assigned the responsibility of drafting and sending the confirmation emails to our supervisors. These emails will outline our chosen topics and request official feedback and validation.
During the meeting we have gone through Ideation phase showing our way of thinking and how we imagine our product. A key part of the discussion was defining the Black Box Diagram to map out the connections between our power source, sensors, and the ESP32 microcontroller. Key notes:
Next Steps: The team is tasked with preparing Structural Drafts for the next meeting (Thursday 12.03) and Black Box Diagram.
-The project meeting focused on refining the TRAQUA structural drafts and the technical integration of the sensor array. It was determined that the current Black Box diagrams must be redrawn to follow professional engineering standards.
-The team analyzed the selection of TDS and temperature sensors, prioritizing a balance between accuracy, physical size, and unit cost to ensure the “Smart Base” remains compact. To support these hardware decisions, the team was asked to prepare a power budget table to calculate the maximum voltage and current requirements for the ESP32 and UV-C driver. The team should also think of the design of the filter and how and when it has to be changed. All components have to be water resistent and food-safe.
-During the early development phases, standard blue LEDs will be used as a safe visual proxy for the sterilization cycle to test the mechanical housing. We also have think about the safety issues of UV-C.
-There was a suggestion to replace placeholder images in the report with original models and to include a new “Smartness Features” table to better differentiate TRAQUA from current market alternatives.
This week’s meeting mainly focused on discussions regarding the technical protection of the UV-C light. First, we presented our ideas related to the bottle geometry and the use of magnetic sensors. The teachers complemented these ideas with additional approaches. One suggested solution was to integrate a magnetometer by placing a magnet in the bottle cap. However, a potential disadvantage of this concept is that the bottle could still be operated in a vertical position. Another option discussed was the use of a material with lower reflectivity in the upper part of the bottle. Additionally, implementing geometric barriers at the top of the bottle could protect both the filter and the user, while also representing one of the simplest technical solutions. To further evaluate this concept, we need to analyse the reflection angles and conduct additional background research.
Furthermore, we were advised to verify whether our logo and brand name already exist. If the brand name is used in a completely different field, it may still be possible to use it, but we should ensure sufficient differentiation. This should also be part of the ethics chapter.
In addition, we need to update the material table and continue working on the report. For the bibliography, we are required to use the BibTeX format provided in the Wiki portal. The black box diagram also needs to be updated, including correcting spelling mistakes.
Regarding the background research section, the material chapter should be revised to present a more general overview rather than focusing specifically on the prototype.
Firstly, the teachers provided information about the interim presentation. The presentation should consist of approximately 10 slides and last around 10 minutes. Each team member is expected to present. The following topics should be covered: the problem, project development, state of the art, marketing, sustainability, ethics, and the solution design, including structural drawings and the smart system, followed by a final conclusion.
Regarding the schematics, some mistakes and potential improvements were identified. For example, issues were noted in the connection of the UV-C lights.
The flyer could be improved by using consistent font sizes and by adding a QR-code linking to the website or the wiki. Additionally, the perspective of the bottle was criticized.
For the report, it was suggested to describe the Gantt chart, backlog and the project development in general in more detail in written form.
Finally, we presented the idea of using a three-piece bottle, which was well received.
During this meeting, we presented our revised budget plan, which now includes more expensive components such as batteries, wires, and other materials. We also discussed the battery configuration and presented the corresponding schematics.
The teachers pointed out that 16 V batteries are not standard and recommended creating a table to verify that the battery consumption requirements are met. They advised us to consider using 12 V batteries instead, while ensuring that they provide sufficient power for the UV-C lights and sensors. Afll changes should be sent to Louis.
In addition, we presented renderings of the water bottle, showing both the interior and exterior views, as well as its three main components.
Finally, we reviewed the requirements for the interim deliverables. We will upload the interim report as a PDF and share the website and app code via GitHub.
For the report, the website and the app the SI have to be corrected.
-3D Model video
-Review revised detailed schematics
-Presentation of leaflet and poster
-Discuss when we are going to receive pieces for the prototype.
During the meeting, feedback on the visual design was discussed. It was noted that adding a hand holding the bottle could be beneficial, as this would strengthen the user suggestion concept and make the intended interaction clearer.
In the context of the video, it was recommended to use darker text in order to improve readability. Furthermore, a stronger contrast between the foreground and background should be established. Adding a surface texture was also suggested to enhance the visual depth of the video. In addition, the integration of the Traqua symbol or logo was proposed.
Regarding the leaflet, it was pointed out that several minor spelling errors need to be corrected. Moreover, parts of the text could be shortened and phrased more concisely to improve clarity and overall impact.
For the poster, it was mentioned that the text fields need to be aligned with the outer layout lines. The headings should be emphasized more clearly to improve visual hierarchy. Additionally, the use of the word “we” should be replaced with “people” to ensure a more appropriate and neutral tone.
Finally, the team was introduced to the task of preparing a scientific paper. This paper is intended to explain the background and context of the project in detail and will be submitted to TEEM´26.
-3D Model video -Final List of Materials & Components -Final List of Providers
The meeting began with a review of technical requirements, specifically the need to add audio to the 3D model video. Regarding component sourcing, it was determined that the website for the battery holder and buck converter must be changed, the team must ensure that all components are sourced from the approved and suggested stores.
The discussion then moved to packaging, where the team confirmed the use of recycled fabrics to maintain sustainability goals. While the current packaging concept is solid, the team needs to establish a specific color palette for the retail versions of the product. Looking ahead to the next meeting, the priority will be to finalize the packaging drawings so that prototype production can begin. Additionally, sample papers from the previous year will be provided to the team shortly to serve as a reference for the required standards.
paper: add personal outcomes (collusion) -do not force float (table, figure) location - use SI -deadline end of May packaging solution including space between 100 and % not 100% image of a bottle itself packaging solution adding for example foam between layers to make it shock absorbing
video: we have different design in terms of video, packaging and poster. we must choose one.
During our last meeting, we finalized the next steps for the prototyping, testing, and documentation phases of the project.
Regarding manufacturing, the team must immediately complete the preparations for the 3D printing process and submit the final design files to production. To assist with the physical assembly of this prototype, we have been provided with new LEDs that need to be integrated into the build.
In terms of testing and quality assurance, two major evaluations are required. First, the water bottle must undergo a theoretical load and stress test to ensure its structural integrity. Second, we need to conduct usability testing for the mobile companion application to optimize its user experience.
Significant progress was also mapped out for our documentation and packaging materials. We decided that the text for the packaging solution needs to be shortened and streamlined. Furthermore, the user manual must be thoroughly proofread to eliminate any typos and grammatical errors, while also being revised to make the content more concise and precise.
Finally, we addressed the academic paper. The team was given instructions to carefully review all sources and references within the document, adding page numbers where they are currently missing. To complete the paper, all remaining chapters must be fully drafted and integrated as soon as possible.
The submission of paper postponed to 5th June. Put results of the functional test on Wiki. Think about making simulation if impact/stress test when for example kid will kick the bottle. UV-C light may be tested in special Lab, and the test will be conducted and we will be notified if it's working. In paper the picture of bottle should be change to the latest one. In paper fig 2. App deigned instead of TRAQUA design. The illustration of packaging solution may be connected with picture of the bottle to not have that many picture in the paper. Put two imagine, and put picture of load stress. Change Erasmus Project Semester to European Project Semester.
Please register here all accomplished project activities
| Start | End | Task | Description | Who |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27.02.2026 | 27.02.2026 | E-mail sending | Drafting and sending the confirmation emails to our supervisors | Bernardo |
| 27.02.2026 | 27.02.2026 | Write 1st Week Report | Write 1st Week Report | Maria |
| 27.02.2026 | 27.02.2026 | Write Minutes | Write Minutes after 2nd meeting | Maria |
| 26.02.2026 | 26.02.2026 | Write Minutes | Write Minutes after 1st meeting | Maria |
| 02.03.2026 | 11.03.2026 | Motivataion Part | write the motivation part of the report's introduction | Rieke |
| 02.03.2026 | 11.03.2026 | Objective Part | write the objective part of the report's introduction | Max |
| 02.03.2026 | 11.03.2026 | Requirements Part | write the requirements part of the report's introduction | Bernardo |
| 02.03.2026 | 11.03.2026 | Problem Part | write the problem part of the report's introduction | Guillem |