Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- report:sus [2026/03/25 10:08] – [Life Cycle Analysis] team3
+++ report:sus [2026/04/23 21:04] (current) – [Life Cycle Analysis] epsatisep
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ===== Eco-efficiency Measures for Sustainability =====
+/*
 //Sustainability is a widely used concept that is applied by companies, organizations and politicians in various contexts.
 This chapter deals with specific measures to minimize the environmental footprint. An overview of the most important aspects of sustainable development and eco-efficiency.
 The eco-efficiency measures for sustainability provide a foundation for understanding our environmental responsibility and resource efficiency.//
+*/
 ==== Introduction ====
-//Throughout history, geo-resources have served as crucial elements in providing all kinds of raw materials. However, excessive consumption has inflicted significant damage on the ecosystems, resulting in pollution and resource depletion. Sustainable engineering presents itself as a solution to this pressing issue, aiming to reconcile the demands of environmental preservation with economic growth.
+Throughout history, geo-resources have played a fundamental role in enabling technological progress and economic development by providing the raw materials required for infrastructure, products, and innovation. However, the increasing intensity of resource extraction and consumption has led to significant environmental degradation, including pollution, ecosystem disruption and growing resource scarcity. In the context of the accelerating climate crisis, there is an urgent and rising need to rethink how products are designed, produced, used and disposed of. Technological solutions, particularly those involving electronic components, contribute not only to societal benefits but also to lifecycle emissions and material demands, making sustainable engineering more important than ever.
-Sustainable engineering plays a fundamental role in these processes as it is rooted in the three pillars of sustainable: environment, society, and the economy. In simple terms, sustainability means to satisfy existing needs, without eliminating the needs of future generations. This correlates also with the 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs) from the United Nations. By adapting to nature, rather than trying to control it, more sustainable practices and products can be created.//
+Sustainable engineering aims to address these challenges by balancing environmental protection with economic viability and social well-being. It is therefore grounded in the three pillars of sustainability: environmental responsibility, economic performance, and social equity. This idea is aligned with the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) established by the United Nations <color #ed1c24>[cite reference]</color>, which provide a global framework for coordinated climate action. Addressing climate change requires not only large-scale systemic transformations but also many small improvements, innovative technologies, and incremental design decisions that collectively reduce environmental impacts and support more resilient consumption patterns.
+Within this broader context, technological innovations such as smart consumer products like TRAQUA can play a meaningful role. Consequently, this chapter examines sustainability from a general and holistic perspective in relation to TRAQUA. First, the relevant SDGs connected to the product are introduced. Subsequently, sustainability is analysed in detail from the environmental, economic, and social perspectives. Finally, a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of TRAQUA is conducted to systematically evaluate its environmental impacts throughout the entire life cycle <color #ed1c24>[cite reference]</color>, thereby identifying potential hotspots and opportunities for improvement.
-In this chapter, sustainability is addressed from a general and holistic perspective. First, the relevant United Nations Sustainable Development Goals that are connected to TRAQUA are introduced. Afterwards, sustainability is examined in more detail from three key perspectives: the environmental, economic, and social dimensions. This structured approach allows for a comprehensive understanding of the broader sustainability context surrounding the product and its value chain. Finally, the chapter concludes with a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for TRAQUA, providing a systematic evaluation of the product’s environmental impacts across its entire life cycle.
 ==== UN Sustainable Development Goals ====
@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 <WRAP centeralign>
 <table tab:sdgs>
-<caption>Add caption</caption>
+<caption>SDGs</caption>
 ^ SDG  ^ Justification  ^
 |{{:report:goal_3.png?100|}}|Goal 3: This goal focuses on ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all at all ages. A smart bottle can support this by encouraging regular hydration, ensuring the consumption of clean drinking water by purifying the water and the bottle and filtering it and helping users develop healthier daily routines through tracking and reminders.  |
@@ Line 43: / Line 43: @@
 ==== Environmental  ====
+/*
 //The environmental influence of products is of high importance in many aspects such as by depleting natural resources or emitting greenhouse gases.
 Concerning the product, it is important to try to reduce negative influences on the environment. This is achieved by reducing, reusing and recycling raw materials; taking into consideration the energy consumption in all phases of the project, as well as by minimizing transport.//
+*/
 The environmental impact of the smart bottle concept can be understood on two main levels. On the one hand there is the influence of the user’s behavior and on the other hand the ecological footprint of the product itself.
-On the behavioral level, the product aims to encourage people to change their purchase behavior, moving away from single-use or PET bottles, and buy TRAQUA.  There are several reasons consumers provide for preferring bottled water over tap water. Some see it as the only option for clean water, for some it is a symbol of status and the modern lifestyle, for others it is simply more convenient, handier, or tastier than tap water [(Yael Parag et al.,2023. Bottled Water: An Evidence-Based Overview of Economic Viability, Environmental Impact, and Social Equity in Sustainability https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9760 [Accessed in March 2026].)]. TRAQUA faces these reasons to increase users’ confidence in drinking tap water by providing hygiene support and transparency about bottle cleanliness.  In particular, people who do not use standard reusable water bottles due to concerns about the quality of tap water become carefree through the smart bottle and change their consumption habits. This can reduce the perceived need to purchase bottled water in single-use or even additional reusable containers.
+On the behavioral level, the product aims to encourage people to change their purchase behavior, moving away from single-use or PET bottles, and buy TRAQUA.  There are several reasons consumers provide for preferring bottled water over tap water. Some see it as the only option for clean water, for some it is a symbol of status and the modern lifestyle, for others it is simply more convenient, handier, or tastier than tap water [(Parag2023)]. TRAQUA faces these reasons to increase users’ confidence in drinking tap water by providing hygiene support and transparency about bottle cleanliness.  In particular, people who do not use standard reusable water bottles due to concerns about the quality of tap water become carefree through the smart bottle and change their consumption habits. This can reduce the perceived need to purchase bottled water in single-use or even additional reusable containers.
-Over time, this behavioral change can lead to significant reductions in plastic waste. Per-capita consumption of bottled water has been increasing continuously and represents the fastest-growing segment within the packaged beverage industry, with projected annual growth rates of around 10 % up to 2026 [(Yael Parag et al.,2023. Bottled Water: An Evidence-Based Overview of Economic Viability, Environmental Impact, and Social Equity in Sustainability https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9760 [Accessed in March 2026].)]. The majority of bottled water is distributed in PET plastic containers, which contribute to environmental impacts throughout the entire product lifecycle, including raw material extraction, production, transportation, and waste management. Plastic bottles require a lot of energy to manufacture, require a complex transportation infrastructure, and are difficult to recycle and clean. They are partly responsible for plastic pollution in the oceans. Carbon dioxide equivalents (CO<sub>2</sub> eq) are used to measure a product’s environmental impact. This allows for a comparison of the impact of various products on the greenhouse effect; to this end, all greenhouse gases emitted during the life cycle are quantified based on their environmental impact. The greenhouse gas emissions over the life cycle of a 500 ml PET water bottle amount to 3.87 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq [(Yael Parag et al.,2023. Bottled Water: An Evidence-Based Overview of Economic Viability, Environmental Impact, and Social Equity in Sustainability https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9760 [Accessed in March 2026].)].
+Over time, this behavioral change can lead to significant reductions in plastic waste. Per-capita consumption of bottled water has been increasing continuously and represents the fastest-growing segment within the packaged beverage industry, with projected annual growth rates of around 10 % up to 2026 [(Parag2023)]. The majority of bottled water is distributed in PET plastic containers, which contribute to environmental impacts throughout the entire product lifecycle, including raw material extraction, production, transportation, and waste management. Plastic bottles require a lot of energy to manufacture, require a complex transportation infrastructure, and are difficult to recycle and clean. They are partly responsible for plastic pollution in the oceans. Carbon dioxide equivalents (CO<sub>2</sub> eq) are used to measure a product’s environmental impact. This allows for a comparison of the impact of various products on the greenhouse effect; to this end, all greenhouse gases emitted during the life cycle are quantified based on their environmental impact. The greenhouse gas emissions over the life cycle of a 500 ml PET water bottle amount to 3.87 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq [(Parag2023)].
 If, for example, a person typically consumes one single-use plastic bottle per day, switching entirely to tap water could prevent the use of more than 700 plastic bottles over two years. This demonstrates how improved trust in local drinking water and bottle hygiene can contribute to more sustainable consumption habits.
@@ Line 57: / Line 58: @@
 On the product level of TRAQUA, sustainability is addressed through material and design choices.
-A reflective material is required for UV cleaning. Theoretically, aluminum, stainless steel, and Polytetrafluorethylen (teflon) would be suitable options. Teflon was ruled out due to health risks and carcinogenic substances. Since steel is heavier and more expensive than aluminum, and aluminum reflects light better due to its surface properties, aluminum was chosen. For reasons of weight and durability, plastic is used for the outer bottle The use of recyclable aluminium and selected plastics supports circular resource use and reduces environmental impact at the end of the product’s lifecycle. The system is designed with durability in mind, including long-lasting technical components and a battery with sufficient lifespan. Modular construction allows critical parts such as filters or electronic components to be replaced individually, extending the overall product lifetime.
+A reflective material is required for UV cleaning. Theoretically, aluminum, stainless steel, and Polytetrafluorethylen would be suitable options. Teflon was ruled out due to health risks and carcinogenic substances. Since steel is heavier and more expensive than aluminum, and aluminum reflects light better due to its surface properties, aluminum was chosen. For reasons of weight and durability, plastic is used for the outer bottle The use of recyclable aluminium and selected plastics supports circular resource use and reduces environmental impact at the end of the product’s lifecycle. The system is designed with durability in mind, including long-lasting technical components and a battery with sufficient lifespan. Modular construction allows critical parts such as filters or electronic components to be replaced individually, extending the overall product lifetime.
-A common reason for replacing conventional reusable bottles is the buildup of dirt, or microbial contamination over time. By integrating active hygiene support such as UV-based cleaning, the product can reduce this issue and encourage longer use. This contributes to waste prevention by lowering the frequency of product replacement.
+A common reason for replacing conventional reusable bottles is the buildup of dirt or microbial contamination over time. By integrating active hygiene support such as UV-based cleaning, the product can reduce this issue and encourage longer use. This contributes to waste prevention by lowering the frequency of product replacement.
 Additional environmental benefits can be achieved through local manufacturing and local distribution strategies. Producing and marketing the product regionally can reduce transportation distances, associated emissions, and packaging requirements. Finally, designing the product for disassembly and recyclability supports responsible end-of-life management and resource recovery.
@@ Line 65: / Line 66: @@
 ==== Economical ====
+/*
 //The economic aspect of sustainability relates to the efficient and cost-effective utilization of resources, aiming to minimize environmental impact while ensuring long-term economic viability. The goal is to strike a balance between environmental responsibility and financial success by devising products, processes, and business models that are both ecologically and economically advantageous.
 Thus, the sustainable economy focuses on the responsible management of economic, social, and environmental resources to support the well-being of current and future generations.
 The goal of economic sustainability is to achieve economic growth without making the negative environmental trade-offs that traditionally occur. It also means that the price of the product matches the time the product fulfils its purpose.//
+*/
 Economic sustainability in the TRAQUA concept focuses on creating a balance between economic growth, long-term user value, and ecological benefits. The product is designed to deliver financial advantages to both consumers and producers while supporting more sustainable consumption patterns.
@@ Line 81: / Line 83: @@
 ==== Social ====
+/*
 //Social sustainability is about identifying and managing business impacts, both positive and negative, on people. It refers to the ability of a project or initiative to foster positive and inclusive social interactions while considering the long-term effects on society.
 The social aspect of sustainability deals with the community, education, equality, justice, social resources, health, well-being, quality education and quality of life. The product TRAQUA meets those social aspects.//
+*/
 Smart hydration solutions can improve everyday life by removing the need to regularly buy and carry single-use plastic bottles, allowing consumers to gain greater flexibility and independence in their daily routines. By relying confidently on tap water, users can hydrate wherever they are without planning purchases in advance or transporting heavy bottles. This supports more convenient, mobile lifestyles while reducing everyday stress related to access to safe drinking water.
-Integrated hygiene support also reduces the effort required to manually clean reusable bottles, leading to time savings and more consistent usage. Filtration features can help maintain a pleasant taste. At the same time, social sustainability requires acknowledging potential challenges. Safety concerns related to technologies such as UV disinfection and integrated electronics must be carefully addressed through responsible engineering design, as discussed in the engineering ethics chapter. In addition, the price of a smart bottle is likely to exceed that of a conventional reusable bottle, which means that not all users will be able to afford it despite efforts to keep the product relatively accessible.
+Integrated hygiene support also reduces the effort required to manually clean reusable bottles, leading to time savings and more consistent usage. Filtration features can help maintain a pleasant taste. At the same time, social sustainability requires acknowledging potential challenges. Safety concerns related to technologies such as UV-C disinfection and integrated electronics must be carefully addressed through responsible engineering design, as discussed in the engineering ethics chapter. In addition, the price of a smart bottle is likely to exceed that of a conventional reusable bottle, which means that not all users will be able to afford it despite efforts to keep the product relatively accessible.
 Through tracking functions, users can better monitor their drinking behavior and stay aware of their hydration levels. This is particularly beneficial for individuals who struggle to drink enough due to busy schedules or health-related challenges, as reminders and feedback can support healthier routines and strengthen awareness of their body’s needs. This can improve overall well-being and support more conscious self-care in everyday life. Inclusivity is also an important social aspect. Features such as voice control or simple feedback signals can make the product more accessible for visually impaired users or people with different levels of technological familiarity.
@@ Line 93: / Line 97: @@
 ==== Life Cycle Analysis ====
-//One crucial task is to assess how each stage of the life cycle contributes to the overall environmental impact. This analysis is typically aimed at prioritizing enhancements in products or processes and comparing various products for internal purposes.
+Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a standardized, scientific methodology used to evaluate the environmental impacts of a product throughout its entire lifespan. Often referred to as a "cradle-to-grave" analysis, it quantifies resource consumption and emissions at every stage.One crucial task is to assess how each stage of the life cycle contributes to the overall environmental impact. This analysis is typically aimed at prioritizing enhancements in products or processes and comparing various products for internal purposes.
 Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) is a method for evaluating the environmental impact of a service or product throughout its life cycle, from design to end-of-life management.
-LCA or life cycle assessment is an essential tool to support sustainable development decision-making, as well as to assess the potential environmental impacts of a product, material, process or activity.//
+LCA or life cycle assessment is an essential tool to support sustainable development decision-making, as well as to assess the potential environmental impacts of a product, material, process or activity [(Laurent)].
-The following graphic illustrates the circular economy approach and the steps in an LCA. Figure {{ref>fig:lca}}.
+The following graphic illustrates the circular economy approach and the steps in an LCA in figure {{ref>fig:lca}}.
 <WRAP centeralign>
 <figure fig:lca>
-{{ :report:lca.png | LCA}}
+{{ :report:lcapicture.png?800 |}}
-<caption>Life cycle analysis.</caption>
+<caption>Life cycle analysis <color #ed1c24>[cite image reference]</color></caption>
 </figure>
 </WRAP>
@@ Line 155: / Line 159: @@
-The table {{ref>tab:CO₂-equivalent}} presents the CO₂-equivalent emissions of the product across the different life cycle stages. The values should be understood as approximate screening results, as detailed primary data for all components were not available. Therefore, the electronic components were aggregated based on their total mass. For these components, as well as for the battery, datasets from the openLCA Nexus [(openLCA Nexus, 2026. https://nexus.openlca.org/database [Accessed in March 2026].)] were used. In general, average datasets for electronic components and material production from publicly available LCA databases were scaled according to component mass, which represents a common approach in early-stage life cycle assessments.
+The table {{ref>tab:Co2}} presents the CO₂-equivalent emissions of the product across the different life cycle stages. The values should be understood as approximate screening results, as detailed primary data for all components were not available. Therefore, the electronic components were aggregated based on their total mass. For these components, as well as for the battery, datasets from the openLCA Nexus [(openLCA2026)] were used. In general, average datasets for electronic components and material production from publicly available LCA databases were scaled according to component mass, which represents a common approach in early-stage life cycle assessments.
-For the activated carbon filter, data from the EU Environmental Footprint Database provided by the European Commission Joint Research Centre were applied [( EU Environmental Footprint Database, 2026. https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ [Accessed in March 2026].)]. The values for the aluminium foil and the plastic bottle were taken from the German ÖKOBAUDAT database [(ÖKOBAUDAT, 2026. https://www.oekobaudat.de/no_cache/datenbank/suche.html. [Accessed in March 2026].)] Furthermore, for the calculation of module C2 (transport), a transport distance of 1000 km by truck was assumed.
+For the activated carbon filter, data from the EU Environmental Footprint Database provided by the European Commission Joint Research Centre were applied [(EUa2026)]. The values for the aluminium foil and the plastic bottle were taken from the German ÖKOBAUDAT database [(OkOBAUDAT2026)]. Furthermore, for the calculation of module C2 (transport), a transport distance of 1000 km by truck was assumed.
 <WRAP centeralign>
-<table tab:>
+<table tab:Co2>
 <caption>CO₂-equivalent</caption>
 <WRAP box center>
-^ Component / Material ^ A1-A3 production [CO₂-e.] ^ C2 transport [CO₂-e.] ^ C3 Waste management [CO₂-e.] ^ D recycling potential [CO₂-e.] ^
+^ Component / Material ^ A1-A3 Production [kg CO₂-eq.] ^ C2 Transport [kg CO₂-eq.] ^ C3 Waste management [kg CO₂-eq.] ^ D Recycling potential [kg CO₂-eq.] ^
 | Electronics assembly (157 g total) | 4.71 | 0.02 | 0.20 | -0.80 |
 | Battery | 1.04 | 0.01 | 0.05 | -0.30 |
@@ Line 174: / Line 178: @@
 </WRAP>
 A screening life cycle assessment based on publicly available datasets indicates that the TRAQUA product has a cradle-to-grave carbon footprint of approximately 6–10 kg CO₂-eq, with aluminium components and electronic assemblies representing the dominant environmental hotspots.
+Compared to a single-use plastic bottle with 3.87 kg CO₂-eq, this value of approximately 6 kg CO₂-eq. may seem very low. One reason for this could be the only broad assessment of the values for electronic components. For these, there are hardly any clear data sources; instead, one must rely on general comparative values. Additionally, the transport routes differ, and it is difficult to predict exact data for transport. However, the 1000 km estimate is considered too low, particularly for electronics. One reason for the comparatively high value of the single-use bottle is that, due to filling and the higher weight, its transport has a greater impact on the CO₂-equivalence than that of empty bottles. It should be emphasized that this LCA is more of an estimate than a precise calculation.
-Following the breakdown of CO₂ equivalents, we now turn our attention to energy. Here, too, energy consumption is broken down by LCA phase, with the sources corresponding to those of the CO₂ equivalents. No distinction is made between renewable and non-renewable energy, as this is not done in all of the databases used. The table {{ref>tab:energy consumption}} shows the energy consumption.
+When the actual process flows in TRAQUA are known and realized, a more systematic LCA could be developed.
+Following the breakdown of CO₂ equivalents, we now turn our attention to energy. Here, too, energy consumption is broken down by LCA phase, with the sources corresponding to those of the CO₂ equivalents. No distinction is made between renewable and non-renewable energy, as this is not done in all of the databases used. The table {{ref>tab:energy}} shows the energy consumption.
 <WRAP centeralign>
-<table tab:>
+<table tab:energy>
-<caption>energy consumption</caption>
+<caption>Energy consumption</caption>
 <WRAP box center>
-^ Component / Material ^ A1-A3 production [MJ] ^ C2 transport [MJ]  ^ C3 Waste management [MJ]  ^ D recycling potential [MJ]  ^
+^ Component / Material ^ A1-A3 Production [MJ] ^ C2 Transport [MJ]  ^ C3 Waste management [MJ]  ^ D Recycling potential [MJ]  ^
 | Electronics | 71 | 0.20 | 2.5 | -8 |
 | Battery | 12 | 0.10 | 0.8 | -3 |
@@ Line 191: / Line 199: @@
 </table>
 </WRAP>
 ==== Summary ====