report:prm

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
report:prm [2026/05/21 10:25] – [Sprint 8] team3report:prm [2026/06/03 15:22] (current) – [Sprint Evaluations] team3
Line 658: Line 658:
  
 === Sprint 8 === === Sprint 8 ===
 +
 +Sprint 8 in Figure {{ref>fig:sprint8}} covered the period from April 30th to May 14th, 2026, with an initial workload of approximately 61 story points. The burndown chart showed a typical late-crunch pattern: after a small reduction at the start of the sprint, progress stayed mostly flat until May 12th, when most tasks were completed. By the end of the sprint, the remaining workload had decreased to around 23 story points, showing significant progress despite work being completed mainly at the end of the sprint.
 +
 {{:report:sprint_8.png?800|}} {{:report:sprint_8.png?800|}}
  
 === Sprint 9 === === Sprint 9 ===
-{{:report:sprint_9.png?400|}}+Sprint 9 in Figure {{ref>fig:sprint9}} covered the period from May 14th to May 21st, 2026, with an initial workload of approximately 55 story points. The burndown chart showed very limited progress during most of the sprint, with only small reductions in remaining work occurring near the end of the sprint period. 
 +By the end of the sprint, the workload had decreased to around 43 story points, indicating that only a small portion of tasks was completed during this sprint. The burndown remained far above the ideal progression line throughout the sprint, suggesting that several tasks were still ongoing at the time of capture. 
 +{{:report:sprint_9.png?800|}}
 ==== Sprint Outcomes ==== ==== Sprint Outcomes ====
 /* /*
Line 677: Line 682:
 The teams' first retrospective in Figure {{ref>fig:retro1}} showed the teams' different education backgrounds and speed, the teams' general workload, and the main idea being lost. To fix this the team decided to book a 1-hour meeting where everyone spoke for 5 min and said where they think the project should head. This helped us find common ground. Other conclusions regarding speed and workload: the team decided to meet more often to spread the workload fairly through the team.  The teams' first retrospective in Figure {{ref>fig:retro1}} showed the teams' different education backgrounds and speed, the teams' general workload, and the main idea being lost. To fix this the team decided to book a 1-hour meeting where everyone spoke for 5 min and said where they think the project should head. This helped us find common ground. Other conclusions regarding speed and workload: the team decided to meet more often to spread the workload fairly through the team. 
  
-<WRAP centeralign>+
 <figure fig:retro1> <figure fig:retro1>
-{{ :report:retrospective1.png?800 |}}+{{:report:retro_1.png?800|}} 
 +{{:report:retro_1bis.png?800|}}
 <caption> First retrospective </caption> <caption> First retrospective </caption>
 </figure> </figure>
Line 689: Line 695:
 <WRAP centeralign> <WRAP centeralign>
 <figure fig:retro2>  <figure fig:retro2> 
-{{ :report:retrospective2.png?800 |}}+{{:report:retro_2.png?800|}} 
 +{{:report:retro_2bis.png?800|}}
 <caption> Second retrospective </caption> <caption> Second retrospective </caption>
 </figure> </figure>
Line 698: Line 705:
 <WRAP centeralign> <WRAP centeralign>
 <figure fig:retro3> <figure fig:retro3>
-{{ :report:retrospective3.png?800 |}}+{{:report:retro_3.png?800|}} 
 +{{:report:retro_3bis.png?800|}}
 <caption> Third retrospective </caption> <caption> Third retrospective </caption>
 </figure> </figure>
Line 711: Line 719:
 <WRAP centeralign> <WRAP centeralign>
 <figure fig:retro4> <figure fig:retro4>
-{{ :report:retrospective4.png?800 |}}+{{:report:retro_4.png?800|}} 
 +{{:report:retro_4_bis.png?800|}}
 <caption> Fourth retrospective </caption> <caption> Fourth retrospective </caption>
 </figure> </figure>
Line 720: Line 729:
 <WRAP centeralign> <WRAP centeralign>
 <figure fig:retro5> <figure fig:retro5>
-{{ :report:retrospective5.png?800 |}}+{{:report:retro_5.png?800|}}
 <caption> Fifth retrospective </caption> <caption> Fifth retrospective </caption>
 </figure> </figure>
Line 729: Line 738:
 <WRAP centeralign> <WRAP centeralign>
 <figure fig:retro6> <figure fig:retro6>
-{{ :report:retrospective6.png?800 |}}+{{:report:retro_6.png?800|}}
 <caption> Sixth retrospective </caption> <caption> Sixth retrospective </caption>
 </figure> </figure>
Line 737: Line 746:
 <WRAP centeralign> <WRAP centeralign>
 <figure fig:retro7> <figure fig:retro7>
-{{ :report:retrospective7.png?800 |}}+{{:report:retro_7.png?800|}} 
 +{{:report:retro_7bis.png?800|}}
 <caption> Seventh retrospective </caption> <caption> Seventh retrospective </caption>
 </figure> </figure>
Line 746: Line 756:
  
 <WRAP centeralign> <WRAP centeralign>
-{{:report:restrospective_8.png?800|}}+<figure fig:retro8> 
 +{{:report:retro_8.png?800|}} 
 +{{:report:retro_8_bis.png?800|}} 
 +<caption> Eighth retrospective </caption> 
 +</figure> 
 +</WRAP> 
 + 
 +Retrospective 9 in Figure {{ref>fig:retro9}} was held with Maria absent. The team reported strong technical progress during the sprint: the prototype advanced significantly, the application was successfully connected to the hardware, most sensors were functioning, and the 3D design was completed and ready for printing. The team also received the project components and was finally able to begin working with the physical sensors. Teachers were satisfied with the project’s direction and overall progress. 
 +Several challenges were also identified. Some incorrect components were delivered, which affected the initial electrical system design, and the approaching prototype deadline created additional pressure on the team. Workload distribution was mentioned multiple times as an area for improvement, with some members experiencing a heavy workload depending on their technical background. The team also agreed that communication about weekly progress should improve further. 
 + 
 +<WRAP centeralign> 
 +<figure fig:retro9> 
 +{{:report:retro_9.png?800|}} 
 +<caption> Nineth retrospective </caption> 
 +</figure> 
 +</WRAP> 
 + 
 +Retrospective 10 in Figure {{ref>fig:retro10}} highlighted strong overall progress, with the team completing the planned tasks for the week and advancing significantly on both the prototype and the project documentation. Most hardware components were connected to the application, extensive testing of individual components was carried out, and the paper and manual were nearly finished. The team also noted that, compared to other groups, a large number of tasks had already been completed, and the teachers remained satisfied with the project’s direction. 
 +Several improvement points were discussed. Communication between team members could still be improved, especially regarding updates on completed work and explaining individual tasks to the rest of the group. Delays in 3D printing and ongoing testing of the UV-C system slowed down the assembly of the prototype, which was not yet completed as originally planned. Workload distribution remained uneven due to different technical backgrounds and areas of expertise. As a result, the team agreed to focus strongly on completing and assembling the prototype during the next sprint. 
 + 
 +<WRAP centeralign> 
 +<figure fig:retro10> 
 +{{:report:retro_10.png?800|}} 
 +{{:report:retro_10bis.png?800|}} 
 +<caption> Tenth retrospective </caption> 
 +</figure> 
 +</WRAP>
  
 ==== Summary ==== ==== Summary ====
  
  • report/prm.1779355506.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2026/05/21 10:25
  • by team3